- Fitting count and zero-inflated count GLMMs with mgcv
- On objects with a reference count of zero
- SKRU - Count Zero (, Cassette) | Discogs
- Related Articles
If you start counting patients and cohorts from 0, then patients 0, 1, and 2 are in cohort 0. Patients 3, 4, and 5 are in cohort 1. Patients 6, 7, and 8 are in cohort 2, etc. These kinds of calculations, common in computer science, are often simpler when you start counting from 0. If you want to divide things patients, memory locations, etc.
Fitting count and zero-inflated count GLMMs with mgcv
Counting centuries is confusing because we count from 1. Because computer scientists usually count from 0, most programming languages also count from zero. Fortran and Visual Basic are notable exceptions. The vast majority of humanity finds counting from 0 unnatural and so there is a conflict between how software producers and consumers count.
Demanding that average users learn to count from zero is absurd. So the programmer must either use one-based counting internally, and risk confusing his peers, or use zero-based counting internally, and risk forgetting to do a conversion for input or output. I prefer the latter.
- Stabat Mater - Score.
- The Culture of Enterprise in Neoliberalism: Specters of Entrepreneurship (Routledge Advances in Sociology).
- Your Answer.
- Caters for both!
- Icarus (Astronomicon);
- Count for Zero - Issachar Initiative;
- Lultimo bunker: La vera storia della cattura di Michele Zagaria, il più potente e più feroce boss dei Casalesi (Italian Edition)?
For a daily dose of computer science and related topics, follow CompSciFact on Twitter. I really hated the code in Numerical Recipies for C because of the kludges they used in converting their Fortran to C. Double-plus ungood. By vascillating I meant inconsistent approaches in the same code base. Imagine this conversation. The first item, has an index of zero in our little corner of the world.
On objects with a reference count of zero
So item one is referred to as item. It was a long time before humans had a concept of zero as a number around the 4th century BC if my history serves me. We computer scientists also describe intervals using half-open notation, starting at the start, but ending one before the end. This makes loops simple, as in this loop over [0,k , that is, from 0 inclusive to k exclusive:.
We tend to index strings and compute substrings the same way, with "abcde". Because zero is the smallest natural number they code, they get away without even writing the zero! Mathematicians are fairly consistent with using half-open intervals too. Matrix element subscripts, for example, start from 1, but power series coefficients start from 0. I am 25 and have an English degree, so it's not like I'm completely in the dark about interpreting the nuance of a given text, but in this case, I think it's one of those things where people who have spent their lives playing video games can pick up a controller and figure a new one out fairly rapidly, whereas someone who never did will get lost in a corner looking at the ceiling.
I've read some sci-fi, but for the most part it's been Star Wars novels and a few other exceptions I spent a huge part of my life being too snobbish for "genre" fiction, but thankfully that phase is over. In any case, I'm familiar with that universe from the jump, so I find those novels easy to follow.
It helps that they're also much simpler than anything Gibson ever wrote. However, thrown into a universe whose rules I don't know without a brief primer is kind of a new feeling for me, so I think that's where my confusion arose. Part of the reason I liked Count Zero better than Neuromancer well, I'll say I enjoyed it more, rather than liked it more , is because I already had some background.
I have a feeling if I go back and read Neuromancer again, I'm going to have a whole new appreciation for it. I always thought the subtlety of the lack of exposition was the great thing about his writing. It's what allows him to write such an incredible short story, and makes his invented world more real.
SKRU - Count Zero (, Cassette) | Discogs
It's described as if he's actually in that world. He trusts the reader. Not at all similar in subject matter, aside from being in the scifi genre. But similar in the knack for knowing what can be left out. I'm not trying to be a hipster-douche, I'm just trying to wrap my head around this being an assigned book to read in high-school. As others here I just have to add my admiration for the Sprawl books.
The disorientating style is a huge part of the reason I love them. The way he often explains a neologism long after it was introduced works so well to depict a fast paced world. And I can definitely see this mindset of "I may not understand now, but I will when the time comes" in my life right now, which just makes Gibson's future more believable. I love those books So it's a bit like reading a book in a foreign language. Since language is certainly going to change in the future, it makes sense that this is part of scifi.
I shared all your sentiments about both books except that I didn't like count zero too much. Some of the ideas are revolutionary and the philosophical questions explored about life and death are interesting, the storyline could have been better.
- A Beautiful Fate (The Beautiful Fate Series Book 1)!
- Radium Eyes.
- Just finished William Gibson's Count Zero : books.
I'll probably read Mona Lisa Overdrive just to complete the series. Every couple of years I have to thin my bookshelves to make room for new books.
I box up a few dozen or hundred to go to the used book store for more store credit. The Gibsons always make the cut.
I might only reread them once every few years but I can't imagine them not being there. Same here. The Gibsons have survived countless moves and clear outs. I can't seem to want to shake them. I'm all misty eyed about it now. I grew up with them, they were a massive influence on me growing up. I can't have read them in 10 years. In the spirit of the books I think I'll get them for kindle.
Cake Day. Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. Just finished William Gibson's Count Zero. Also on the list! Continue this thread. Ok so here's a few thoughts. I found the neuromancer study guide super useful. I read the first book back in '87 or so. God Emperor of Dune.